Relatively radical in part, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has adopted an approach to defining best interests that has been likened to a ruling on the test for obscenity in the Jacobellis v Ohio court case in 1964, when Justice Potter Stewart of the US Supreme Court encapsulated the test as, 'I know it when I see it'. While it might be odd to compare a test for obscenity with one for best interests, the principle of judging in hindsight is a sound one, although not useful for p

Continue reading with a subscription to the SRP market intelligence platform.

Request a demo

Already a subscriber? Login